Is A Bear Market Impossible Without The FED Tightening?

At lease that is the argument made by the fellow in the video below. And he is right. Most of the previous bear markets have been ushered in by the FED tightening. For instance, 2000 and 2007 bear legs are a good example.

With that in mind, it is really different this time. The stakes are much higher. The FED has maxed out its capability to wage war on recession through QE and keeping interest rates at zero over the last 8 years. We now live in the world where a fear of a laughable 25 bps rate hike can send the Dow down 2,000 points in 2 trading days. Plus, when the economists begin to warn that the health of the World Economy is dependent on the FED not raising interest rates, Fed should wait with raising rates: World Bank economist, we are in trouble. Bit time.

In other words, don’t for a second think that we are in a normal business cycle or macro environment here. We are not. The FED went all in. The only question is……will the bet pay off or will this house of cards come crashing down……fast? We should know soon.

Z30

Is A Bear Market Impossible Without FED Tightening? Google

What You Should Expect From The FED Tomorrow

Daily Chart April 28 2015

4/28/2015- A mixed day with the Dow Jones up 72 points (+0.40%) and the Nasdaq down 5 points (-0.10%). 

So, does it matter what the FED says tomorrow? Not really and not if you value your money. Here is why.

As far as I am concerned there is only one thing, and one thing only, that is holding this market together. The FED and investors blind faith in the fact that the FED will be able to stop any and all market corrections. Either through QE, interest rates or by simply making statements to the press. So much so that every single bottom over the last couple of months can be attributed to the FED talk.  El-Erian tends to agree. Danger, Danger — ‘Market Is in Love With Central Bank Trade’

Here are the 3 reasons as to why this “herd mentality trade” will blow up in investors faces. And much sooner than most people believe. 

  1. The Fed is a Reactionary Force: If we study the past, the FED has always been late to react to any and all market developments. For instance, Bernanke was talking about the accelerating US Economy as late as Q1 of 2008. They have no clue and there is no reason to believe that this time will be any different.
  2. The Market Will Decline Anyway: My mathematical and timing work makes it very clear. Over the short-term the market is independent of all fundamental inputs. That is to say, the market will top out on a certain date in 2015 and initiate its decline. No matter what the FED does or say. That day is approaching fast.
  3. Investors Will Lose Confidence In The FED: This is unavoidable. As soon as the FED is unable to backstop the next decline, most investors will lose confidence in a millisecond.  That in itself will accelerate the decline

The main take away from the points above is as follows. The FED trade will be in place until it is not.  The problems is, by the time most investors realize this fact, it will already be too late. By the time the analysis above becomes a reality, the stock market will already be down 10-25%.

This conclusion is further supported by my mathematical and timing work. It clearly shows a severe bear market between 2015-2017. In fact, when it starts it will very quickly retrace most of the gains accrued over the last few years.  If you would be interested in learning when the bear market of 2015-2017 will start (to the day) and its internal composition, please CLICK HERE.

(***Please Note: A bear market might have started already, I am simply not disclosing this information. Due to my obligations to my Subscribers I am unable to provide you with more exact forecasts. In fact, I am being “Wishy Washy” at best with my FREE daily updates here. If you would be interested in exact forecasts, dates, times and precise daily coverage, please Click Here)Daily Stock Market Update. April 28th, 2015  InvestWithAlex.com

Did you enjoy this article? If so, please share our blog with your friends as we try to get traction. Gratitude!!!

What You Should Expect From The FED Tomorrow Google

Will The Fed Forgo Raising Interest Rates?

subprime car loans

Quite a few bears think that they should or that they will. I believe that they should, but I don’t think that they will forgo the eventual rate hike.

“In my view, the Fed will not increase interest rates this year,” he told CNBC’s “Squawk Box,” pointing to dollar strength and recent disappointing economic data. “The economy simply [is] not taking off, so I don’t see there will be an interest rate increase.” – Mark Faber

“The U.S. economy is sicker than ever,” said Schiff. “And the Fed is going to launch QE4 for the same reason they launched QE3, 2 and 1. They’re going to try to stimulate the economy. Now that they stopped QE, the air is coming out of this bubble.”

And according to Schiff, if the Fed does raise interest rates later this year, the outcome will be catastrophic. “I think without QE4, we will be back in recession,” he said. “It’s going to be horrible. There’s going to be a worse financial crisis than 2008.”

I agree with the views above. The underlying US Economy is sick and on the verge of recession. With that in mind, the bears above are forgetting two things. First, the FED needs to re-load on their recession fighting tools before the next one hits (we are almost there). And second, the FED is a reactionary force. Meaning, it has always been behind the ball in terms of reacting to various economic developments. I don’t think that will change now.

z33

Will The Fed Forgo Raising Interest Rates? Google

The Shocking Truth About When This Bull Market Will End

NEVER. At least according to the view most delusional bulls share (video above). Just as they did at 2000 and 2007 tops. The keyword this time around is “Creativity”. The US Economy/markets will be able to overcome all of their structural issues because of ……..”oozing creativity”. Plus, this secular bull market has another 9-12 years to go. Fair enough, but one should also realize that we might still be in a secular bear market that started in 2000 and will only end in 2017. An analysis I have clearly outlined here Why A Bear Market Of 2015-2017 Is Unavoidable

In the meantime, something interesting happened yesterday. A senior FED official suggested that rates should not be raised until 2016 and the market didn’t even react. Fed’s Evans wants no rate hikes until early 2016.

“Given uncomfortably low inflation and an uncertain global environment, there are few benefits and significant risks to increasing interest rates prematurely.  A rate hike will be not be appropriate until early 2016”.

In the past such a statement would have set off a massive rally of at least 200 points. Not this time around. Has the market finally had enough of the FED’s BS? We can only hope so, but this might represent an important turning point.

Z30

The Shocking Truth About When This Bull Market Will End Google

Idiots At The FED, “Let’s Jack Up The Rates…NOW”

Handout photo of Kansas City Federal Reserve Bank President Esther GeorgeAt least for the Kansas City Federal Reserve Bank President Esther George, the future is crystal clear. According to her, the US Economy will continue to accelerate, interest rates will go significantly higher and the FED will eventually work through it’s $4 Trillion Junk balance sheet without a sweat. The time to raise the rates is NOW.  Fed’s George wants rate hikes soon, and not too gradual

With her vision being so clear, it must be a personal sacrifice working for the FED and NOT making billions on Wall Street. Yet, the reality is quite different.

Interest rates continue to decline while flattening the yield curve (suggesting a recession), the stock market is back to the bubble/speculation levels unseen since the 2000/2007 tops and the FED continues to tighten.  As I have mentioned before, the worst thing they can do now is cut the QE, let alone raise interest rates. Proving once again, the FED is nothing more than a reactionary force.

All of this is confirmed by my mathematical and timing work. It shows a severe bear market/recession within the US between 2014-2017. When this bear market starts it will very quickly retrace most of the gains accrued over the last few years. If you would be interested in learning exactly when this bear market will start and its subsequent internal composition, please Click Here. 

z32

Why The FED Will Tighten This Market To Oblivion

While the market, at least for the time being, sees today’s FED tightening as a sign of strong future economic growth, it is a grave misconception.  Richard Fisher, president of the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas states….

“I personally expect us to end that program in October,” Fisher said. “And then we have to see how the economy is doing, including these broader measures of unemployment, and where we stand, before we can talk about how we might move the short-term rate.”

I can tell you one thing, by the time they finish tightening in October it will be too late to save this market from it’s bear leg and this economy from a severe recession. It was this sort of backwards thinking that set off the 2008 crisis as well. Don’t get me wrong, I hate the QE and other stimulus as much as any other rational investor, yet tightening now is equivalent to financial suicide.

With the stock market being at an unsustainable (bubble) level and with the large chunk of the economy relying entirely on FED financing, massive liquidity and speculating, any tightening would not only slow the economy down, it will bring it to a screeching halt.

These developments are further confirmed by our mathematical and timing work. Again, our work shows a severe bear market between 2014-2017. When it starts it will very quickly retrace most of the gains accrued over the last few years. If you would be interested in learning exactly when the bear market will start (to the day) and its subsequent internal composition, please CLICK HERE

fischer investwithalex

Did you enjoy this article? If so, please share our blog with your friends as we try to get traction. Gratitude!!!

Click here to subscribe to my mailing list

 

Why The FED Will Tighten This Market To Oblivion  Google

Bloomberg: Fed’s Fisher Says Economy Strengthening as Payrolls Rise

The U.S. economy is “moving in the right direction” and “getting stronger” as private-sector payrolls increase, saidRichard Fisher, president of the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas.

“The private sector is beginning to hire,” said Fisher, a voting member of the central bank’s policy committee, said today on the Fox News program ’’Sunday Morning Futures.’’ “We’d like to see that continue and, in fact, increase.”

Employers added 288,000 jobs in April, the biggest monthly gain in two years, the Labor Department reported May 2. At the same time, more than 800,000 people abandoned the labor force and the share of working-age Americans in a job or looking for one fell to a 36-year low.

“We’re continuing to see job creation,” and people who want jobs “will start looking for work, join the workforce, be hired, as business expands in the United States,” Fisher said.

Fisher has said the labor market has been hindered by a shortage of trained workers. The latest Fed Beige Book review of economic conditions highlighted the pinch, with employers in six of 12 districts — Dallas, New York, Cleveland, Richmond, Chicago and Kansas City — reporting difficulty finding skilled workers.

In most areas around the nation, “there are jobs available in certain high-skilled areas, but we don’t have the educational basis for it or we don’t have the immigrant pool for it, or whatever it may be,” Fisher said today.

“There is a skills mismatch; that’s part of the problem,” he said.

Paring Buying

After accumulating assets to shore up the U.S. economy following the 2008 financial collapse, the Federal Reserve this year began paring bond buys amid improved job growth and household spending. As of last month, the Fed held almost $4.3 trillion in assets, a record.

Since December, policy makers have reduced their monthly purchases four times, in $10 billion increments, to $45 billion. The central bank is on course to wind down the stimulus by the end of the year and is likely to hold the benchmark interest rate near zero for a “considerable time” after that, according to an April 30 statement from the Federal Open Market Committee.

“I personally expect us to end that program in October,” Fisher said. “And then we have to see how the economy is doing, including these broader measures of unemployment, and where we stand, before we can talk about how we might move the short-term rate.”

Fisher last month warned that investors might be taking on excessive risk.

U.S. credit markets are “awash in liquidity” and potentially unsustainable stock-market valuations and bond yields “give rise to caution,” Fisher said in an April 4 speech in Hong Kong.

Fisher, 65, opposes Fed action that would increase inflation. Prices rose 1.2 percent in March from a year earlier, well short of the Federal Reserve’s 2 percent inflation target.

fischer investwithalex

Today’s Market Action Is A Perfect Example Of Why You Should Never Follow The FED

Yesterday, the market soared on the FOMC Minutes indicating slower tightening (if any at all) over the next few years. Just as we have been saying for a long time. Today, Narayana Kocherlakota, president of the Minneapolis Federal Reserve Bank suggested that the central bank might push its main interest rate even lower or cut the rate it pays banks on excess reserves kept at the U.S. central bank to accelerate economic recovery.

Say what? 

How can you cut something that is already technically ZERO. Since the rates are at zero and the yield curve is flattening as we speak, what are they going to do when the next recession hits? QE 100 Billion, 500 Billion, $1Trillion/month or will they just send everyone a check for $1 Million. And that’s the biggest problem here. The FEDs have already used up their BAZOOKA and there is nothing they can do to prevent, stop or reverse the next recession. As per out mathematical work the next recession/bear market will transpire between 2014-2017. Checkmate. 

unconventional FED

Did you enjoy this article? If so, please share our blog with your friends as we try to get traction. Gratitude!!!


Click here to subscribe to my mailing list

 

Today’s Market Action Is A Perfect Example Of Why You Should Never Follow The FED Google

 

Reuters: Fed could cut rates to combat joblessness: Kocherlakota

ROCHESTER, Minnesota (Reuters) – The Federal Reserve should do more to boost both inflation and jobs, a top Fed official said on Tuesday, including possibly pushing its main interest rate even lower or cutting the rate it pays banks on excess reserves kept at the U.S. central bank.

“The key is for us to be able to demonstrate in an effective fashion that we are committed to the recovery,” Narayana Kocherlakota, president of the Minneapolis Federal Reserve Bank, told reporters after a speech.

The Fed has been winding down its massive bond-buying stimulus since early this year, and Kocherlakota said he has no plans to “relitigate” that decision, which puts the Fed on track to ending bond-buying altogether before the end of the year.

Instead, he said on Tuesday, the Fed must do better on returning the economy more rapidly to full employment and a healthy 2-percent pace of inflation.

The Fed has kept its short-term policy rate between zero and a quarter of a percentage point since December 2008, and Kocherlakota told the Greater Rochester Chamber of Commerce that “we should be thinking about” pushing it even lower.

“It’s really about demonstrating a commitment to stay with the recovery for as long as it takes to get the economy fully recovered,” he said.

The idea of lowering the Fed’s main policy rate, already near zero, or cutting the rate the Fed pays to banks on reserves they keep locked up at the central bank, is outside the mainstream of current Fed policymaking, which currently is focused on providing guidance about what economic conditions could lead to the Fed raising rates.

Kocherlakota, whose lone dissent against the Fed’s policy decision last month marks him as the central bank’s most dovish member, said that guidance falls short.

“We would be better off having more of a collective vision as a committee to what the change in conditions would have to be that would lead us from ending the asset purchase program to raising rates,” he told reporters.

“Unless we communicate as a group about what those conditions are, then we face this instability that two words in a press conference, or two words in a speech or an answer to a Senator can end up moving financial markets participants’ vision of what we are trying to do with policy.”

The Fed last month said it would reduce its monthly bond purchases to $55 billion and would continue to trim the program in measured steps as long as the economy improves as it expects.

After the policy-setting meeting, Fed Chair Janet Yellen briefly roiled markets when she suggested the Fed may start raising rates around “six months” after the bond-buying program ends. She also said that the timing of any rate hike depends on economic conditions, but that message was lost in the immediate aftermath of her answer.

“Unless we communicate more effectively on a collective basis about how conditions are shaping our policy choices, I think we going to continue to face that kind of instability,” Kocherlakota said.

In recent weeks several Fed policymakers have given their views as to when rates ought to start rising, although forecasts from all 16 current policymakers show nearly all expect it sometime next year.

Kocherlakota on Tuesday refused to be drawn about his personal expectations for when rates should rise.

He reiterated his expectation that the U.S. economy will likely grow around 3 percent this year and that unemployment will fall to the “low sixes” by the end of this year, from 6.7 percent now.

“It’s a question of the speed of the recovery, not about whether we are seeing a recovery,” he said.

Inflation, which is running near 1 percent, is “too low” and does not look likely to rise back to the Fed’s 2 percent goal for another four years, Kocherlakota said.

“Low inflation in the United States tells us that resources are being wasted,” he said, including the productive potential of Americans who cannot get jobs because demand for goods and services is so low.

And while unemployment has fallen from the recession-era high of 10 percent, “the U.S. labor market is far from healthy,” he said. Longer term, he said, unemployment should fall to just over 5 percent.

Kocherlakota’s view that the Fed should do more is no secret: The Fed, in his view, should have promised to keep rates near zero until U.S. unemployment falls below 5.5 percent, as long as inflation and financial stability risks are contained.

Instead, the Fed last month dropped the idea of tying low rates to any specific unemployment figure and said it would factor in a wide range of economic measures as it judged the correct timing for raising rates.

Kocherlakota said that the Fed could reword its policy statement show “a stronger commitment to the recovery in terms of being willing to stay accommodative for as long as it takes to see the recovery to completion.”

What Happens When “Unconventional” FED Becomes Conventional. Clue…It’s Scary

Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis President James Bullard said Monday the easy-money policies that have defined central bank actions over recent years have been….

“I think unconventional U.S. monetary policy has been sufficiently aggressive to replicate the outcomes that would have been achieved in more traditional times and is an effective tools to stimulate growth.”   

Fair enough, but this begs the question. Since the FED already used their BAZOOKA of unconventional warfare against the recession and the financial collapse (2008-today), what are they going to do the next time it happens? While most economists would argue that 2008-09 was once in a lifetime, that is simply not true. Particularly, given today’s economic setup. Due to the same “unconventional” tactics, the economic setup we have today is not that different from the 2007. Basically, it is an extension of it at much higher leverage level.

So, what will happen when Unconventional and Conventional no longer work? I think we are about to find out. One thing is for sure, it looks scary.  

unconventional FED

Did you enjoy this article? If so, please share our blog with your friends as we try to get traction. Gratitude!!!


Click here to subscribe to my mailing list

 

What Happens When “Unconventional”FED Becomes Conventional. Clue…It’s Scary  Google

WSJ Writes: Fed’s Bullard: Unconventional Fed Actions ‘Sufficiently Aggressive’

Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis President James Bullard said Monday the easy-money policies that have defined central bank actions over recent years have been effective tools to stimulate growth.

The official said that even though the Fed cut rates effectively to zero percent at the end of 2008 and has provided stimulus via unconventional bond buying programs and guidance about the outlook for short-term rates since that time, these tools appear to replicate the influence its traditional regime of manipulating short-term interest rates once delivered.

“I think unconventional U.S. monetary policy has been sufficiently aggressive” to replicate the outcomes that would have been achieved in more traditional times, Mr. Bullard said.

That said, the current tool kit of unconventional policies has some challenges. “It is difficult for policy to respond to declines in inflation” when short-term rates can be cut no further, Mr. Bullard said. Bond buying and future rate increase guidance “may or may not substitute effectively” for traditional changes in short-term interest rates, he said.

Mr. Bullard made his comments in presentation materials that largely mirrored a recent speech he gave in Hong Kong. He repeated Monday his belief that while the issue remains up for debate, he sees little value in increase international coordination between central bank leaders when it comes to making monetary policy.

Mr. Bullard’s presentation was prepared for delivery before an event at the USC Marshall School of Business in Los Angeles. The official, who doesn’t currently hold a voting role on the monetary policy setting Federal Open Market Committee, didn’t make forward looking comments on U.S. monetary policy or the economy.

Recently Released Documents Reveal Central Bank’s Criminal Incompetence. Their Views Take Stupidity To A New Level

janet yellen investwithalex

Over the last couple of years I have argued, sometimes passionately, that the Federal Reserve doesn’t really know what is going on within our own economy and our financial markets. Not only that, but I have also argued that they are a bunch of idiots and fools who believe that they can somehow control our financial markets.

If recently released transcripts, generated during the 2008 meltdown don’t prove my point of view without a shadow of a doubt, I don’t know what will. Here are just a few quick points from the said transcripts.

  • They didn’t even realize recession was happening until the 4th quarter of 2008. By that point the stock market has completed 80% of its down move.  In fact, for most of 2008 they thought the recession “could be avoided”.

—-Hello???? Was anyone home??? Recession started in Q4 of 2007.

  • Bernanke talked about pent-up demand for housing as late as January 2008.
  • Bernanke was worried about inflation as late as January 2008.
  • Throughout Q1 of 2008 they have held a generally rosy view of the world and the US Economy

Here are the links to two great articles about the transcripts if you would like to learn more. Click Here and/or Click Here

bernanke meme

The lesson here is twofold.

First, anyone who believes that the FED can either control, anticipate or predict financial markets and/or the economy is even a bigger fool.  Neither Bernanke nor Yellen can predict the economy even if it hit them in the face with a brick. All they can do is look at past data and say “Oh, look, according to this data recession started in Q4 of 2007”. What a waste of time and money.  

Second, they will always be behind the ball. They will always be a reactionary force as opposed to market makers. Take today’s environment for example. They are cutting QE and talking about raising the interest rates at exactly the wrong time. The damage from their crazy liquidity party has already been done. The worst thing they can do now is cut it. The faster they do it the faster the markets will collapse.  

Why is any of this important?

Well, if you rely on FED to make money in the stock market and/or run your own business it becomes incredibly important. As such, no one should rely on any action by the FED as an investment indicator. It is as simple as that.

This brings us to financial markets and my premise that financial markets behave exactly as they should. Many people would argue that it was the FED’s actions that put the bottom in at the March of 2009 juncture, ensuring a subsequent and massive stock market rally.

WRONG.

Don’t confuse cause and effect. It was the market that made the FED’s look good and not the other way around. The market was structured to bottom on March 6th, 2009 at 6,469 and then have a subsequent 5-year market rally. It was the mid-cycle bottom (half point of bear market) and I predicted it as early as January of that year. I was 1 day and 100 points away. Close enough. I know I have shown this chart before, but let’s take another look.

Long Term Dow Structure35

If you perform the type of 3-dimensional analysis that I do you would know that the move between 2003 bottom and 2009 bottom would be IDENTICAL to the move between 1994 bottom and 2002 bottom. And so it was, exhibiting a variance of 22 3-dimensional units (equivalent to a few trading days or 100 points).

Any analyst working with this information would know that as soon as 2007 top was confirmed that the next move down would be exactly 8,130 3-dimensional units. Once the market developed further, the same analyst would be able to pin point the exact bottom with amazing precision and that is what I want you to understand without a shadow of a doubt. The stock market is not volatile or random, it is exact and precise.

Same thing applies to today’s market. In last week’s forecast I identified a turning point in February. While I am not yet at liberty to discuss this turning point (available to premium subscribers only), it clearly explains the market action we have witnessed over the last couple of days. By concentrating on mathematics and 3-dimensional analysis one can pick out turning points with a precision of a surgeon.

It is just my hope that the points above will force you to re-examine your reliance on the FED while eliminating your sense of false security. 

Did you enjoy this article? If so, please share our blog with your friends as we try to get traction. Gratitude!!!

Recently Released Documents Reveal Central Bank’s Criminal Incompetence. Their Views Take Stupidity To A New Level

FED Unemployment Delusions

I have argued, for at least a few years, that the FED is delusional and behind the ball most of the time. If minutes released from their 2008 meetings don’t prove that without a shadow of a doubt, I don’t know what will. If you recall, those minutes clearly showed Bernanke anticipating economic growth and worrying about housing prices going up as late as Q3 of 2008. Mind you, the stock market was already down more than 30% at that stage. To keep their stupidity streak alive, the FED presents us with another gem. Get this, according to James Bullard, president of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, the unemployment rate will fall below 6% this year. 

The reality, of course, is a little bit different. Never mind the fact that their unemployment calculation understates the real unemployment by a good 2-4%. The most significant issue here has to do with where we are in the economic cycle. Based on our mathematical and timing work, the bear market of 2014-2017 is about to rear its ugly head. Shortly thereafter, the US Economy will fall back into a severe recession where unemployment will quickly surge. To be honest, I am afraid Mr. Bullar will see 10% unemployment before he sees 6%. 

Just more prove, as if you needed any, that the FED is ill-equipped for forecasting future economic developments. 

If you would be interested in learning exactly when the bear market of 2014-2017 will start (to the day) and its internal composition, please Click Here. 

z31

Did you enjoy this article? If so, please share our blog with your friends as we try to get traction. Gratitude!!!


Click here to subscribe to my mailing list

 

FED Unemployment Delusions  Google

Reuters: Fed’s Bullard says U.S. jobless rate expected to fall below six percent this year

HONG KONG (Reuters) – The U.S. unemployment rate will fall below 6 percent by the end of this year, a Federal Reserve official said on Wednesday, offering a bullish view on the country’s economy after central bank comments sent shock waves through financial markets last week.

James Bullard, president of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, said that the outlook for the U.S. economy is “quite good,” despite data from early in the year.

“The biggest thing is that unemployment has come down more quickly than expected,” said Bullard, speaking on a panel at the annual Credit Suisse investor conference in Hong Kong.

He added later during a question and answer session that more progress is needed in the labor market before U.S. policymakers can consider raising interest rates.

Bullard is known to be one of the Fed’s more hawkish policymakers. He previously advocated for a rate hike as early as 2014, a stance he appears to have backed away from.

U.S. monetary policy tightening took center stage last week after a two-day policy meeting, when the Fed said it expected to keep benchmark interest rates near zero for a “considerable time” after it wrapped up a bond-buying stimulus program, which it is widely expected to do toward the end of the year.

Pressed on the statement at a news conference afterward, Fed Chairman Janet Yellen said the phrase “probably means something on the order of around six months or that type of thing.” Stocks and bonds immediately tumbled as traders took the statement to suggest rate hikes could come sooner than they had anticipated.

Bullard has joined other Fed officials in playing down the “six months” comment from Yellen, saying it was in line with what the private sector was anticipating. He repeated that view on Wednesday.

The unemployment rate for February rose to 6.7 percent from a five-year low of 6.6 percent as Americans flooded into the labor market to search for work.

But the rate hovering around the Fed’s previous 6.5 percent benchmark has raised the prospect of the central bank moving to push up rates more quickly than some in the market previously expected.

Fed officials appear increasingly worried that keeping policy so easy for so long could encourage investors to take too many risks, building bubbles that may eventually pop and roil financial markets.

The U.S. economy is “set for a pretty good year,” Bullard said on Wednesday. “Despite the spate of weaker data in the January, February time frame.”

The Fed has held rates near zero since late 2008 to help the economy recover from the 2007-2009 recession.

Bullard was asked about where he saw interest rates in 2016, at which point he referred to his “dot.”

The Fed introduced a “dot chart” in its January 2012 economic projections. Each dot represents the view of an individual policymaker on how they see the appropriate level of interest rates for the coming few years.

“I’m here to tell you that my dot has not changed,” Bullard said.

Data on Tuesday showed U.S. consumer confidence surged to a six-year high in March and house prices increased solidly in January, positioning the economy for stronger growth after a weather-induced soft spot.